SB 862 – Relating to Insurance Coverage for Vehicle Leases
On Monday, March 18, SB 862 by Senator Kelli Stargel (R-Lakeland) was heard before the Senate Banking and Insurance Committee and was reported favorably with 5 yeas and 1 nay. AIF stood in support of this legislation.
Florida’s Dangerous Instrumentality Doctrine (DID) was created in the early 20th century, a time where automobiles began traveling on public roads. The doctrine has been expanded far beyond the borders of its original intent and now applies to off-highway vehicles such as golf carts, tractors, and construction equipment. The doctrine holds owners or lessors liable for the harm caused by an operator, even when the lessor is not in control of the equipment or vehicle at the time of the incident. Florida is the only state in the country where DID is applied in this manner.
This bill provides that lessors of special mobile equipment are not liable for the acts of the lessee or lessee’s agent or employee if the lease agreement requires the lessee to maintain insurance with limits of at least $100,000/$300,000 for bodily injury liability and $50,000 for property damage liability, or at least $500,000 for combined property damage liability and bodily injury liability. Special mobile equipment are vehicles not designed or used primarily to transport persons or property and that are only incidentally operated or moved over a highway. Examples include ditchdigging apparatus, well-boring apparatus, and road construction and maintenance machinery, draglines, self-propelled cranes and earthmoving equipment.
SB 862 will now move to the Senate Judiciary Committee.
AIF supports the protection of owners and lessors from vicarious liability which is harmful to Florida’s business community.
HB 847 – Relating to Preemption of Conditions of Employment
On Tuesday, March 19, HB 847 by Representative Bob Rommel (R-Naples) was heard in the House Workforce Development and Tourism Subcommittee and was reported favorably 9 yeas and 5 nays. AIF stood in support of this legislation.
This bill amends s. 218.077, F.S., regarding state preemption of conditions of employment. The bill:
- Expressly prohibits a county, city, district, or other public body created by state law from requiring an employer from paying a minimum wage other than the state or federal minimum wage or to offer other conditions of employment;
- Expressly preempts to the state the right to regulate any requirements imposed upon employers relating to a minimum wage and conditions of employment;
- Defines “conditions of employment” to include preemployment screening, job classification, job responsibilities; hours of work; scheduling and schedule changes, wages, payment of wages, leave, paid or unpaid days off for holidays, illness, vacations, and personal necessity, and employee benefits;
- Voids any ordinance, regulation, or policy currently in existence which is now preempted.
HB 847 will now move to the House Local, Federal, and Veterans Affairs Subcommittee.
AIF supports legislation that allows Florida businesses to adhere to state or federal wage requirements, thus eliminating onerous regulations set by municipalities.
HB 1161 – Relating to Malt Beverages
On Tuesday, March 19, HB 1161 by Representative Spencer Roach (R-North Fort Myers) was heard before the House Business and Professions Subcommittee and was reported favorably with 14 yeas and 0 nays. AIF stood in support of this legislation.
This bill creates a process for returns of malt beverages by a vendor to a distributor for an exchange of product, a refund, or a credit. A vendor may return malt beverages to a distributor if the malt beverages are a “damaged product,” an “out-of-code” product,” or an “undamaged product.” An “out-of-code product” is a malt beverage that has exceeded the manufacturer’s code date indicating the product’s freshness and availability for purchase at retail. A distributor is not required to accept a return request. A product may not be returned because it is overstocked or slow-moving or because there is only limited or seasonal demand for the product. Under the bill, a vendor may request return of undamaged product to a distributor only for exchange of product or for credit and an out-of-code product may be returned to a distributor only for an exchange of product.
HB 1161 will now move to the House Government Operations and Technology Appropriations Subcommittee.
AIF supports legislative efforts to revise outdated laws that impose burdens and restrictions on any sector of the business community, including vendors and distributors of malt beverages.
SB 1730 – Relating to Growth Management
On Wednesday, March 20, SB 1730 by Senator Tom Lee (R - Brandon) was heard in the Senate Community Affairs Committee and was reported favorably with 5 yeas and 0 nays. AIF’s Senior Vice President of State and Federal Affairs, Brewster Bevis, stood in support of this legislation.
This bill amends various statutes relating to growth management, restricts the ability of a county or municipality to adopt and enforce inclusionary housing ordinances or regulations, and sets timeframe parameters for building application approval or denial. After receiving a development permit application, the county and municipality must review the application for completeness and issue a response within 30 days. The bill also requires the collection of impact fees, which are an important source of revenue for local governments to fund infrastructure projects. Additionally, the bill prohibits a local government from charging an impact fee for the development or construction of affordable housing but provides an exception under certain circumstances.
SB 1730 will now move to the Senate Infrastructure and Security Committee.
AIF supports legislation that maintains our state’s infrastructure, allows Floridians access to affordable housing, and streamlines fee regulations.
SB 232 – Relating to Percentage of Elector Votes Required to Approve an Amendment or a Revision
On Wednesday, March 20, SB 232 by Senator Dennis Baxley (R-Lady Lake) was heard in the Senate Ethics and Elections Committee and was reported favorably with 4 yeas and 3 nays. AIF’s Senior Vice President of State and Federal Affairs, Brewster Bevis, stood in support of this legislation.
This bill changes the vote threshold for amendments and revisions to Florida’s constitution from the current 60% of elector votes to 66 and 2/3%.
SB 232 will now move to the Senate Judiciary Committee.
AIF supports the measures contained in this bill to prevent interest groups’ circumvention of the legislature in revising Florida’s constitution.
HB 3 – Relating to Preemption of Local Regulations
On Thursday, March 21, HB 3 by Representative Michael Grant (R-Port Charlotte) was heard in the House Commerce Committee. and was reported favorably with 18 yeas and 5 nays. AIF’s Senior Vice President of State and Federal Affairs, Brewster Bevis, stood in support of this legislation.
This bill aims to preempt authority to the state and away from local governments when it comes to business regulations. Both big and small businesses must abide by the rules and regulations set in place by their local governments, regardless of if that rule or regulation differs from city to city, or county to county. This circumstance causes those who conduct business in multiple cities or counties throughout the state to abide by a myriad of rules that are inconsistent and must be complied with in order to continue their business. AIF believes that preempting business regulation to the state will allow for a streamlined system that businesses, (old and new, small and large) can easily follow when conducting business across the State of Florida.
HB 3 will now be heard on the House floor.
AIF supports legislation that will streamline business regulation throughout the state.
HB 261 – Relating to Beverage Law
On Thursday, March 21, HB 261 by Representative Josie Tomkow (R-Auburndale) was heard in the House Commerce Committee and was reported favorably with 21 yeas and 0 nays. AIF’s Senior Vice President of State and Federal Affairs, Brewster Bevis, stood in support of this legislation.
Florida’s Tied House Evil Law prohibits a manufacturer or distributor of alcoholic beverages from having a financial interest in the establishment of a licensed vendor, and prohibits a manufacturer or distributor from giving gifts, loans, property, or rebates to retail vendors. This bill amends and clarifies certain exemptions granting manufacturers the right to partner with vendors, so long as the manufacturer’s agreement does not impose on sales of other manufacturers’ brands.
HB 261 will now be heard on the House floor.
AIF supports legislative efforts to clean up laws imposing burdens and restrictions on manufacturer and vendor partnerships.
HB 355 – Relating to Dangerous Instrumentality Doctrine
On Thursday, March 21, HB 355 by Representative Tom Leek (R-Daytona Beach) was heard in the House Judiciary Committee and was reported favorably with 12 yeas and 4 nays. AIF’s Senior Vice President of State and Federal Affairs, Brewster Bevis, stood in support of this legislation.
Florida’s Dangerous Instrumentality Doctrine (DID) was created in the early 20th century, a time where automobiles began traveling on public roads. The doctrine has been expanded far beyond the borders of its original intent and now applies to off-highway vehicles such as golf carts, tractors, and construction equipment. The doctrine holds owners or lessors liable for the harm caused by an operator, even when the lessor is not in control of the equipment or vehicle at the time of the incident. Florida is the only state in the country where DID is applied in this manner.
HB 355 will now be heard on the House floor.
AIF supports the protection of owners and lessors from vicarious liability which is harmful to Florida’s business community.
Proposed Committee Bill COM 19-01 – Relating to Property Development
On Thursday, March 21, PCB COM 19-01, sponsored and heard by the House Commerce Committee, was reported favorably with 21 yeas and 2 nays. AIF’s Senior Vice President of State and Federal Affairs, Brewster Bevis, stood in support of this legislation.
Property development in Florida is governed in part by both the Community Planning Act and the Florida Building Code. Before a building permit can be issued, plans review and inspections must be conducted by the local building official or a private provider to ensure work complies with the building code. Private providers are licensed building code administrators, licensed engineers, and licensed architects that property owners can hire to review building plans and perform building inspections. This bill makes changes to property development regulations by:
- Restricting counties and municipalities from adopting or imposing certain mandatory affordable housing ordinances;
- Establishing time limits for a county or municipality to review a development order or permit application;
- Expanding the scope of a private provider by allowing services involving the review of site plans and site work engineering plans;
- Reducing the time period building departments have to review a permit application when a private provider approves the plans, from 30 business days to 5 business days;
- Limiting the building department’s authority to audit a private provider to four times annually;
- Prohibiting a building official from replicating plan reviews or inspections performed by a private provider;
- Allowing a person who hires a private provider to petition the court for a writ of injunctive or other equitable relief if the person believes the building department is not complying with the law.
AIF supports legislation that streamlines the permitting process and reduces property development burdens for all Floridians.