Weekly Legislative Update from January 12, 2018
                                  
                                    
                                    Welcome back for the 2018 Legislative Session! The  focus this year will encompass a myriad of issues in the legislature including,  hurricane preparedness and relief due to the impacts of Hurricane Irma and  Maria; continuing to fight against policies that will increase the cost of  health care for Florida’s business community, such as prior authorization,  retroactive denial of claims and removal of step-therapy protocols; battling  back legislation pushed by the Trial Bar that would make it more expensive for  businesses to operate in our state; and supporting Governor Scott’s $87.4  billion budget which includes $180 million in tax cuts that will go a long way  in continuing to help our state achieve prosperity and growth Florida’s businesses  and families deserve. In addition to focusing on legislation, AIF will be  taking action on Constitution Revision Commission proposals that will impact  the business community.  
                                     We began the first week of session with a gathering of  legislators, lobbyist, leaders in the business community and others at the  Annual Legislative Reception, an eagerly anticipated event hosted by Associated  Industries for more that four decades. The video below highlights legislators  than attended the event and they share their goals for the 2018 Session. 
                                    
                                     
                                    Tuesday kicked off the official start of the  legislative session with the Governor, Senate President, and House Speaker all  giving their opening day speeches for their final time in those roles. To view  the speeches please see the below links. 
                                    Governor Scott 2018 State of the  State Address 
                                    Senate President Joe Negron 2018  opening day speech 
                                    House Speaker Richard Corcoran 2018  opening day speech  
                                   
                                    Weekly Legislative Update Video
                                      
                                    
                                   
                                  
                                    
                                      Constitution Revision Commission (CRC)
                                      On Thursday, January 11th, Proposal 48 by Commissioner Jacqui Thurlow-Lippisch  was presented to the CRC Executive Committee (committee). The committee voted  down on Proposal 48 by a vote of 1 yea to 5 nays. AIF spoke against  this proposal during the committee meeting.
                                      Currently, under Article IV, section 9 of the  Florida Constitution, the FWC has the regulatory and executive powers of the  state over wild animal life and fresh water aquatic life. Proposal 48 sought to  amend Article IV, section 9 by expanding the FWC’s regulatory and executive  powers to include habitats, including wildlife corridors. AIF noted during the  committee that the FWC believes the existing constitutional provision provides  adequate scope, authority, and means for the Commission to conserve the  features essential to sustaining fish and wildlife, including impacts that  could result in death or injury of imperiled species, or that could  significantly impair essential behavioral patterns such as breeding, feeding,  or sheltering.
                                      AIF opposed Proposal  48 as we believe the current powers the FWC holds are adequate, and due to the  negative impact the proposal would have on private property rights. 
                                      
                                      Proposal  23 Relating to Natural Resources and Scenic Beauty
                                      On Friday, January 12th, Proposal 23 by  Commissioner Jacqui Thurlow-Lippisch was presented to the CRC Judicial  Committee (committee). The committee unanimously voted down on Proposal 23. AIF spoke against this proposal. 
                                                                            Proposal 23 sought to create vague rights to a clean  and healthful environment by giving anyone the authority to sue to enforce  these rights without regard to existing rules and permits.  Under this  proposal, a business lawfully operating with valid permits and no history of  any compliance problems could be sued and forced to defend itself because “any  person” thinks they should be more esthetically pleasing or meet their personal  standard of clean or healthful, rather than a scientifically-derived standard  from EPA or DEP.  AIF opposed Proposal 23 as it would have opened up  not only Florida businesses, but private citizens as well, to endless  litigation. 
                                                                            Please see the below statement from AIF Senior Vice  President of State and Federal Affairs, Brewster Bevis, on Proposal 23:
                                      
                                      AIF STATEMENT REGARDING CRC JUDICIAL COMMITTEE’S VOTE ON CRC PROPOSAL 23
                                       Tallahassee, Fla.—Associated Industries of Florida (AIF) Senior Vice President of  State and Federal Affairs Brewster Bevis released the following statement  regarding the Judicial Committee of the Constitution Revision Commission  unanimously voting today to oppose CRC Proposal 23.
                                      “AIF commends the  CRC’s Judicial Committee for listening to the concerns of Florida’s business  community and appropriately voting down CRC Proposal 23.
                                      This unnecessary proposal  would have opened up not only Florida businesses, but private citizens as well,  to endless litigation and harmful uncertainty.
                                      “With the Judicial  Committee’s vote today, Florida’s comprehensive, thoughtfully crafted  environmental policy will remain intact, continuing to protect the rights of  Floridians and provide much-needed regulatory certainty and stability for businesses  moving forward.
                                      “We support the decision  made by the CRC Judicial Committee today and agree that proposals such as this  do not belong on the Florida Constitution.”
                                      # # # 
                                      
   
                                      
                                      Proposal 51 Relating to Deregulation                                        
                                      On Friday, January 12th, Proposal 51 by Commissioner Rich Newsome was presented to the CRC General Provisions Committee (committee). The committee voted down on this proposal. AIF stood in opposition to this proposal. 
                                      Proposal 51 sought to deregulate the state's electric utility industry by creating a new section in Article X of the Florida Constitution; providing that electricity customers may choose from multiple electric providers in a competitive market, and are not restricted to purchase service from one provider. The proposal also provided that electricity customers may sell, trade, or dispose of their electricity as they please. The effect of this proposal is to deregulate electric service in Florida. AIF opposed Proposal 51 as deregulation is a complex undertaking that has led to price increases, fraudulent practices and consumer confusion. 
                                     
                                   
                                    Legal & Judicial
                                      
                                    HB 33- Relating to  Texting while Driving & SB 90-Relating  to Use of Wireless Communications Devices While Driving
                                    On Tuesday, January  9th, HB 33, by Representative Jackie Toledo (R-Tampa) and Representative  Emily Slosberg (D-Delray Beach) was heard by the House Transportation and  Infrastructure Subcommittee and passed by a unanimous vote of 14 yeas to 0 nays. AIF’s  Senior Vice President of State and Federal Affairs, Brewster Bevis, stood in  support of this legislation.
                                    On Wednesday, January 10th, SB 90 by Senator Keith Perry (R-Gainesville) was heard by the Senate  Committee on Transportation and passed by a vote of 5 yeas and 0 nays. AIF’s Senior Vice President of State and  Federal Affairs, Brewster Bevis, stood in support of this legislation.
                                    Currently, Florida law prohibits a person from  texting, emailing, and instant messaging while driving; however, enforcement of  this is a secondary offense, which means a law enforcement officer must detain  a driver for another traffic offense in order to cite the driver for texting  while driving. The bill would change the current enforcement of the ban on  texting while driving from a secondary offense to a primary offense, allowing  law enforcement officers to stop a vehicle solely for texting while driving.  This legislation also specifies that the enforcement officer who has made the  stop must inform the driver that they have the right to decline a search of  their wireless communication device. The main goal of this legislation is to  eliminate a component that contributes to distracted driving on Florida’s  roadways. 
                                    There is a difference between the two bills, in  that SB 90 requires that all fees collected for this offense be remitted to the  Department of Revenue to then be deposited into the Emergency Medical Services  Trust Fund of the Department of Health. 
                                    HB 33 will go on to  the House Judiciary committee for its next hearing.
                                    SB 90 will go on to the Senate Appropriations  Subcommittee on Transportation, Tourism, and Economic Development for its next  hearing. 
                                    AIF supports  legislation that addresses the issue of distracted driving and will ensure  public safety for all on Florida’s roadways.
                                     
                                    SB 760 & HB 623-Relating  to Grounds for Nonrecognition or Out-of-Country Foreign Judgments
                                    On Tuesday, January  9th, SB  760, by Senator  Aaron Bean (R-Jacksonville) was heard before the Senate Committee on  Commerce and Tourism, and unanimously passed by a vote of 8 yeas to 0  nays. AIF’s Senior Vice President of State and Federal Affairs,  Brewster Bevis, stood in support of this bill.
                                    On Thursday, January 11th, HB 623, by Representative Cord Byrd (R-Jacksonville) was heard before the  House Judiciary Committee and passed by a vote of 17 yeas to 0 nays. AIF’s Senior Vice President of State and  Federal Affairs, Brewster Bevis, stood in support of this bill.
                                    This legislation  amends the Uniform Out-Of-Country Foreign Money - Judgment Recognition Act,  codified in chapter 55 F.S., to add two additional permissive grounds for  nonrecognition of a foreign money judgment by a Florida court. The Act  currently provides three mandatory grounds for nonrecognition and eight  permissive grounds for nonrecognition of a foreign judgment. Of the mandatory  grounds that are similar to those in the bill, the Act requires nonrecognition  where the foreign country’s court system is systematically unfair, failing to  provide impartial tribunals and compatible due process of law.
                                    These bills adds two  permissive grounds for when a Florida court may decline to recognize a foreign  judgment on more individualized due process grounds: 
                                    
                                      - There is “substantial  doubt” about the “integrity” of the particular foreign court that rendered the  judgment. 
 
                                      - The particular foreign  court that rendered the judgment failed to afford due process in the  proceedings.
                                        
                                       
                                    
                                    SB 760 will go on to  the Senate Committee on Rules to be heard.
                                    HB 623 will go on to the House  floor for consideration. 
                                    AIF SUPPORTS legislation to  clarify existing law and protect Florida businesses from foreign  judgments that are not compatible with the requirements of due process of  law. 
                                     
                                    SB 822- Relating to  Beverage Law
                                    On Wednesday, January  10th, SB 822 by Senator Travis Hutson (R-Palm Coast) was heard before  the Senate Committee on Regulated Industries and passed by a vote of 7 yeas and  2 yeas. AIF’s Senior Vice President of State and Federal Affairs,  Brewster Bevis, stood in support of this bill.
                                    Florida’s “Tied House  Evil Law,” s. 561.42, F.S., prohibits a manufacturer or distributor of  alcoholic beverages from having a financial interest, directly or indirectly,  in the establishment or business of a licensed vendor, and prohibits a  manufacturer or distributor from giving gifts, loans, property, or rebates to  retail vendors.
                                    The bill exempts a  written agreement between a manufacturer or importer of malt beverages and an  alcoholic beverage vendor for brand naming rights, including the right to  advertise cooperatively from the “tied house evil” prohibitions, and then  agreement must be negotiated at arm’s length for no more than fair market value.
                                    SB 822 will move on to  the Senate Committee on Commerce and Tourism for its next hearing.
AIF SUPPORTS  legislation that removes burdensome regulations on Florida’s businesses.
                                   
                                    Taxation
                                      
                                    HJR 7001-Relating to  Supermajority Vote for State Taxes and Fees
                                    On Tuesday, January  9th, HJR 7001, by Representative Tom Leek (R-Daytona Beach) was heard before  the House Appropriations Committee and passed by a vote of 20 yeas to 8 nays. AIF  stood in support of this bill.
                                    This joint resolution  proposes an amendment to the state Constitution that would provide that no  state tax or fee may be imposed, authorized, or raised by the legislature, or  authorized by the legislature to be raised except through legislation approved  by two-thirds of the membership of each house of the legislature.
                                    The joint resolution  requires that any proposed state tax or fee imposition, authorization or  increase must be contained in a separate bill that contains no other subject.  The joint resolution also specifies that the proposed amendment does not  authorize the imposition of any state tax or fee otherwise prohibited by the  state Constitution, and does not apply to any tax or fee imposed by, or  authorized to be imposed by, a county, municipality, school board, or special  district.
                                    The amendment proposed  in the joint resolution will take effect on January 8, 2019, if approved by  sixty percent of the voters during the 2018 general election or earlier special  election. The joint resolution is not subject to the governor’s veto powers.
                                    HJR 7001 has been  placed on the House calendar to be considered on the floor. 
AIF supports this legislation requiring  two-thirds vote from each house of the legislature to pass tax increases in the  state. This action would that would make it more difficult to raise taxes,  leaving more money in the pockets of Florida’s families and business.
                                   
                                    Health Care
                                      
                                    HB 21-Relating to  Controlled Substances
                                    On Wednesday, January  10th, HB 21 by Representative Jim Boyd (R-Bradenton) was heard before  the House Health Quality Subcommittee and passed by a vote of 15 yeas to 0 nays. AIF’s  Senior Vice President of State and Federal Affairs, Brewster Bevis, stood in  support of this bill.
                                                                        This bill addresses  opioid abuse by expanding the use of the Prescription Drug Monitoring Program  (PDMP), increasing regulation of prescribers and dispensers, and aligning state  criminal statutes with federal law. HB 21 limits the prescription for a  Schedule II opioid to alleviate acute pain to a three-day supply, or a  seven-day supply if deemed medically necessary by the prescriber.
                                    The bill also requires  the Department of Health (DOH) to adopt rules establishing guidelines for  prescribing controlled substances for acute pain, similar to those for chronic  pain. Additionally, The bill also requires a health care practitioner  authorized to prescribe controlled substances to complete a board approved 2-hour  continuing education course on safely and effectively prescribing controlled  substances, and to review a patient’s PDMP history prior to prescribing or  dispensing a controlled substance.
                                    HB 21 will go on to  the House Appropriations Committee to be heard.
                                    AIF supports  legislative efforts that aim to curb opioid abuse and addiction that is  currently running rampant through the state effecting Florida’s families and  businesses.
                                     
                                    SB 98-Relating to  Health Insurer Authorization
                                    On Thursday, January  11th, SB 98, by Senator Greg Steube  (R-Sarasota) was heard before the Senate Committee on Rules and  passed by a vote of 11 yeas to 0 nays. AIF’s Senior Vice President of  State and Federal Affairs, Brewster Bevis, spoke in opposition to this bill.
                                    This legislation  creates a standard process for the approval or denial of (1) prior  authorizations and (2) step therapy (“fail-first”) protocol exceptions.  Currently, the many health insurance carriers in Florida employ robust policy  product offerings containing medically-proven prior-authorization and  step-therapy programs designed to reflect the protocols and standards of care,  advanced and adopted by a vast array of specialty physicians based on their  latest evidence-based research. 
                                    These procedures and protocols allow for the  use of the safest, most appropriate and most cost-effective drug, and permit  progressing to other, more costly drugs with more sophisticated interactions  and side-effects, in accordance with FDA approvals.
                                    SB 98 will move on to  the Senate floor to be heard.
AIF opposes this  legislation as it would force insurers and consumers to purchase the most  expensive drugs and treatments even when equally effective therapies are  available at much lower costs.
                                   
                                    Economic Development
                                      
                                    SB 170-Relating to  Rural Economic Development Initiative 
                                    On Thursday, January  11th, SB  170, by Senator  Denise Grimsley (R-Lake Placid) was heard by the Senate Committee on  Agriculture and passed by a vote of 6 yeas to 0 nays. AIF stood in  support of this bill.
                                    Currently, Florida’s  rural communities are experiencing additional challenges compared to their  urban counterparts in many quality of life indicators. The state has an  opportunity to improve the economic competitiveness of Florida’s rural  communities by reforming the Rural Economic Development Initiative  (REDI).  This legislation accomplishes this by:
                                    
                                      - Reducing the number of  specified agencies and organizations that are required to designate REDI  representatives;
 
                                      - Clarifying which  individuals from specified agencies and organizations must be designated as  REDI representatives;
 
                                      - Providing for the  appointment of five additional members from the private sector:
                                        
                                          - Three of the private  sector members are to be appointed by the executive director of the Department  of Economic Opportunity (DEO), one appointed by the President of the Senate,  and one appointed by the Speaker of the House of Representatives;
 
                                        
                                       
                                      - Authorizing the  creation of ad hoc committees and provides guidance for the organization of ad  hoc committees;
 
                                      - Modifying the  definition and designation criteria for a rural area of opportunity  (RAO); 
 
                                      - Updating the annual  reporting requirements; and 
 
                                      - Make conforming  changes to address cross-references in numerous sections of the Florida  Statutes.
                                        
                                       
                                    
                                    SB 170 will go on to  the Senate Committee on Government Oversight and Accountability to be  heard.
AIF SUPPORTS efforts  to increase economic development in Florida’s rural areas by increasing job  growth. 
                                   
                                    Education
                                      
                                    SB 88-High School  Graduation Requirements
                                    On Thursday, January  11th, SB 88, by Senator Dorothy Hukill (R-Port  Orange), was read for a third time on the Senate floor and passed by a  vote of 34 yeas to 0 nays. 
                                    Currently, based on  Next Generation Sunshine State Standards, high school students receive  financial literacy instruction as part of the one-half Economics course credit  required for graduation. The bill revises that standard to require students  entering grade 9 in the 2018-2019 school year and thereafter to complete a  one-half standalone course credit in personal financial literacy.
                                    SB 88 will go on to  the House floor for consideration.
AIF SUPPORTS  legislation that provides students the tools to learn about relevant, and  real-life subjects that will prepare them for the workforce in the future.